Question for Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

On Wednesday 23^rd Jan, a number of nationalists attended a public meeting with Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe at Croydon College. Surprisingly I was allowed to ask him a question.

 Question

Why are racially motivated crimes against white people not taken as seriously as those committed against other ethnic minorities?

I know the commissioner will try to deny this, so I have a couple of disgraceful examples.

Firstly; the night stalker Delroy Grant was found guilty of a number of burglaries and rapes, carried out on elderly men and women, all of whom were White, yet none of his crimes were treated as racially motivated.

Secondly the cases of a number of women arrested for alleged racially motivated public order offences. Jacqueline Woodhouse (a White lady) was sentenced to 21 weeks imprisonment over an incident on the Central Line. Emma West (a White Lady) is awaiting trial over an alleged incident on the Croydon Tram and has served a couple of weeks on remand and Vandell Brooks (a Black Lady) was sentenced to 1 week imprisonment and a £200 fine for an incident on a London Bus, at a secret trial that the police would not disclose the date of. Vandell had already failed to appear at a previous hearing. The Police, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Press all came down a lot harder on the White women than the Black woman. How do you justify this??????

(The question received a great response from the audience)

Answer

Hogan-Howe refused to fully answer the question; on grounds that some of the cases are ongoing (in fact Emma West’s case is the only ongoing case that I mentioned)

He did say that ‘some cases need extra attention due to people being unable to speak English or having mental health issues, then he repeated the lie that “everyone is treated the same regardless of race”.
 

My Question to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe 

CPS claims of death threats called into question

The Police are only investigating one threat against Emma West, despite the Crown Persecution Service claiming there have been a number of threats. When asked about the investigation into death threats to Emma, D.I. Paul Kerr of Croydon Borough Violent Crime Team said “So far I have had around 30 complaints in relation to one particular posting. This is the posting that is currently under investigation.” D.I. Kerr wouldn’t say if this had been reported by the CPS.

It would appear that the CPS felt the threats were serious enough to be the only reason for remanding Emma, but didn’t consider them serious enough to report them to the Police.

Fortunately Emma has now been released on bail by the Crown Court, to spend Christmas with her family.

The local media have been entirely one sided in the reporting of this story. The Croydon Advertiser reported on the case and completely failed to mention the fact that she was remanded for her own safety, due to alleged death threats and even condemned several groups for supporting her. The Advertiser has never questioned what happened to start the confrontation or why ethnic’s don’t get arrested for similar or worse on public transport.

In contrast, Viktor Kovacs a man accused of masturbating outside a school, in view of children, stood smugly in the dock with a bag that had an anti-CCTV slogan on it. He was bailed to appear at Croydon Crown Court on 20^th January next year with the only condition that he doesn’t go within 50m of St Philomena’s Catholic High School for Girls or Pound Street, Carshalton, with no mention of other schools, parks or places with children. This happened in the same court on the same day as Emma West was remanded yet none of the local papers reported the story. They clearly see swearing on a Tram as worse the paedophilia.